Angry Supreme Court Justice With An Agenda
Most Justices have an agenda, but we’re supposed to pretend they will “impartially” decide cases and the charade of confirmation exists to see whether they can obviously lie or stone-wall well enough for the Senate to pretend they will be fair.
Now, Justice Clarence Thomas settles old scores (really dignified for a United States Supreme Court Justice, huh?) in an angry and vivid forthcoming memoir, scathingly condemning the media, the Democratic senators who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court, and the “mob” of liberal elites and activist groups that he says desecrated his life.
Can we stop pretending he has been anything but angry and vindictive since he was installed years ago?
September 29, 2007 | Filed Under News & Information
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.